The title’s kinda clickbait, they’re removing the ‘Full’ option and adding a choose your own apps dialogue to the ‘Minimal’ (and now only) option, and installs the selected apps over the internet. This reduces ISO size since the apps aren’t installed by default.
Which is an action I can agree with.
It’s not clickbait, it’s just intentionally misleading at best, and factually wrong at worst. It’s not ditching the minimal option, it’s making it the default.
Yeah what the fuck? It’s literally the exact opposite of the title.
A “Minimal Ubuntu”? Like … Debian?
Shots fired.
I think he hit the bullseye 🤭
Look here buster that was a stretch at best!
Should we squeeze more from this?
These puns got me all wheezy!
Clickbait title… But
I think this is a good idea; giving folks, by default, more control over what is going onto to their systems. Reduces the bloat and the ISO size is definitely useful in certain situations. Power of choice to the users!
Such a misleading title… if they actually do this you will still be able to install the minimum version of Ubuntu, you just get the option to pick additional software that automatically gets installed as snap packages.
I really don’t see the issue. If you don’t want any additional application or if you don’t want snap packages don’t pick anything. It really is their choice to support Snap packages, and snap and flatpack packages are just a lot easier to support for distro maintainers.
Pls no I just did a minimal Ubuntu install on my MS Surface and I guarantee I’m going to need to reinstall it at least 2 more times as I bork the entire OS trying to customize GNOME.
Timeshift go brr
Dear liberals, you claim you installed “minimal” Ubuntu, yet you use GNOME instead of XFCE. Curious.
I like bling but I don’t like bloat on my hard drive. Checkmate mister.
I don’t like bloat on my hard drive
So you installed GNOME? This is not the checkmate you think it is.
I think the fact that you’re so bothered by me using default GNOME but wanting to pick my own apps is reason enough to keep it. Cry more about my personal decisions 😄
I’m bothered by the fact that you made a statement that’s not internally consistent and contradicts itself. Like whatever you like, but if you’re going to cite a reason, be accurate. Don’t be so dense.
How is “GNOME is bloat” an objective fact? Maybe to you GNOME is bloat because you don’t use it. But they use GNOME, so it’s not bloat to them.
Conversely, if they don’t use XFCE, then having XFCE installed by default is a bloat to them.
Don’t be so dense.
Pot, meet kettle.
As much as I like/enjoy to circlejerk about Ubloatu… they are giving more options for customization. Which is way better than (just) giving it a “minimal” option.
Until we see what this actually means, it’s just speculation.
But I will say this, I dropped Ubuntu when they forced snaps on me, I only needed super slim server installs that I could make into what I needed. As a result this actually doesn’t mean much to me, other than its clear that Ubuntu has been making bad decisions in the last few years.
However, If I couldn’t install a minimal desktop with no apps like libreoffice, firefox and a bunch of stupid games, I would be pissed right off.
