I noticed that Lemmy has the reddit system with upvotes and down votes, but I didn’t found anything about the general ratio of up/down a user have, am I missing something or it is intended?

  • Spzi@lemmy.click
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a valid and valuable point.

    Personally, I don’t want people to write just what other want to read.

    Instead, I want people to write what they really want to say without thinking about their score

    In a way, both systems are just different implementations of social regulation. One system achieves it through numbers. If you remove numbers, people will still express their approval or dismissal, in words. This has some regulating effect on what people write, how openly they express themselves. And I’m not even sure that’s a bad thing.

    Of course, in a system with karma people can still additionally express their reactions with words.

    My main point is, we cannot have a system without social regulation, that’s just an inherent part of human interactions. I can think of reasons for and against amplifying it further with karma. Personally I like it though.

    • elkinpass@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think they were refering to “karma whoring”. It has nothing to do with social regulation, just the fact that there’s a bunch of people (and bots!) that will do anything for fake internet points. It’s just insincere at the end of the day.

      • Spzi@lemmy.click
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I think you are right. I did not distinguish properly between karma within a thread, and karma across threads, on an account level.

        Within threads (which is what we have here) karma can function as a social regulator. Across threads (which we don’t have) it depends on too many other factors like community size to have that effect.

        I agree the latter encourages “karma whoring” without being able to sort good from bad anymore. So at the end of the day, I find the current system is a quite sensible compromise.