• RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Switzerland? Netherlands? Hell, even France, Germany?

    Invoking cronyism as a downside in itself is silly. It’s not what matters, what matters is the quality of life. And just because US and a few other capitalist countries have drank from the neoliberal fountain and are unable to stop, it doesn’t mean that that is the only way. In fact social democracies, of which there are quite a few examples around the world, are pretty much still capitalist democracies whit none of the crap neoliberal ideas lead to.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every one of those four is a mixed economy with significant central economic planning and regulation. Without substantial oversight, capitalism tends to degrade into private monopolies with feudalistic tendencies over time. Like I said, it’s an idealistic system which looks great until actual people are involved. Then you have to either modify it past anything but a spiritual similarity, or drown in the neoliberal fountain.

      • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every one of those four is a mixed economy with significant central economic planning and regulation.

        Every one of those four economies are democratic capitalist economies. What is mixed?

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          central economic planning and regulation

          The fact that every successful “capitalist” economy is heavily regulated speaks to the efficacy of pure capitalism.

          • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There is no such thing as pure capitalism. If you’re talking about capitalism without regulations, that is called anarcho - capitalism and it doesn’t actually exist anywhere at the moment.

              • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I am giving you examples of perfectly functioning nations under capitalism, you’re replying one sentence nonsense. This conversation is over

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I am responding to your points with the same logic you initiated. You won’t acknowledge that you’re operating on a double standard where communism is a fundamentally idealistic and flawed whenever actually implemented, but it’s different for capitalism because reasons. This conversation never started.