When I read through the release announcements of most Linux distributions, the updates seem repetitive and uninspired—typically featuring little more than a newer kernel, a desktop environment upgrade, and the latest versions of popular applications (which have nothing to do with the distro itself). It feels like there’s a shortage of meaningful innovation, to the point that they tout updates to Firefox or LibreOffice as if they were significant contributions from the distribution itself.

It raises the question: are these distributions doing anything beyond repackaging the latest software? Are they adding any genuinely useful features or applications that differentiate them from one another? And more importantly, should they be?

  • lemmur@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me distro’s role is to repackage things and then test them to check if they work together. Kinda like a premade sandwitch.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I’d rather the distro be as boring as possible while the exciting stuff happens upstream.