I have met a couple of them in real life, and a few I have met online. The sample is not significant enough to draw any conclusions about their point of view and background.

I am more than interested in your opinions about the personality and political makeup of people who express this type of pro-C bigotry.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    The borrow checker

    This is indeed pretty unique.

    the way it handles exceptions and nulls

    This is really just the fact that Rust has sum types - but those kinds of types have been used in many functional languages (Haskell for example) for a long time.

    the way it handles stack/heap

    This is just the same as C and C++ and any other low-level language that requires you to distinguish between the stack and heap.

    composition pattern instead of oop

    I mean if you’re only looking at OOP languages then this will be new, but functional languages have done this for a long time.

    So yea, I think a big part of what makes Rust great is that it has managed to take these really, really good ideas from functional programming languages and made them work in a language that is not entirely functional. This leads to a perfect blend/best of both worlds with regards to OOP and functional programming :)

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah it’s just the borrow checker and ownership stuff that throws you for a loop. Particularly with large system design