• Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point I’m getting concerned with the amount of climate change we’ve got going on if they may be forced to relocate in the not too distant future

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The highlands of scandinavia should be safer than most and might suit them, with rømmegrøt and hallingdans on Hardangervidda

      • Lifted_lowered@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pacific Northwest is probably okay that’s why we are trying to build dual power to replace the government when it collapses and fight the Nazis who want to do the same

          • Lifted_lowered@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you live here? Probably okay means survivable, literally over a billion people will die if they can’t move from the unsurvivable parts

            • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t need to live in a place to know that heat domes, droughts, and rampant wildfires do not describe a place that’s “probably survivable.” You will not be able to live there 15-20 years from now.