• narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is inaccurate. You are not buying it (the media), you are buying the right to stream it (as long as the seller provides the media as a stream). You don’t “buy” a movie unless you are paying for it’s ownership, which would be millions of dollars. For physical releases you buy the disk and the right to watch it under certain conditions (DRM). And you generally don’t have a right be able to “buy” or have access to all media.

    But all that doesn’t automaticly make it amoral. this comment is gonna be downvoted to hell

    edit: There are probably gonna be more responces, so this will address everything else I have to say. What I wrote is how things are legally, more or less. I don’t like that either. I do consider piracy stealing (under current laws) and morally right. Stealing is just not that great term for digital stuff. Please don’t try to (uselessly) sway me and don’t infight

    • Melkor@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s kind of their point, because we are not in fact buying the media the argument is that piracy has some moral element. Put another way there is no option to own it outside of piracy.

    • Quetzacoatl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      this meme is a criticism of that. it shouldn’t be like that. if I buy a chair, I own the chair. I can then choose to sit on it, burn it, or give it to my neighbor, whatever. if I buy a movie, it’s suddenly not like that – but not because of some inherent quality that would make it impossible, but only because they say it is like that. but they have one weakness: it’s only like that if we actually stick to those rules. they’re all arbitrary anyway! we can therefore treat a bought movie just as it should be: a physical copy that we actually own. we can then decide to watch it, to lend it to our neighbor, to play it for everybody to see on the street, to cut it and remix it and do something new with it. will they come and claim we’ve “pirated” their media? yes of course, but this is nonsensical, dead law, that has to be broken again and again by just – ignoring it, and making it not so. if I buy a movie, I do own the movie, and the company that says otherwise can get fucked. that’s what this is about.

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For physical releases you buy the disk and the right to watch it under certain conditions (DRM).

      I’d like to point out German law (maybe this expands to EU and other countries) with traditional media.

      Traditionally you bought movies and music on physical discs. You had a guaranteed right to be able to sell it to other people, as well as make personal copies of it for private use/backups.

      DRM has always tried to oppose this right. And obviously, in the last decade(s) a lot went into service-oriented streaming and temporary access instead of owning even on a partial or theoretical level.

    • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Piracy is always stealing. Y’all can keep trying to spin it if it helps, but its pure copium.

        • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well first of all, yes it is stealing to take something that does not belong to you. The definition of stealing is not beholden to the consequences of the actions itself.

          Furthermore, if you pirate to avoid paying a subscription, then yes they are losing something. I’m a massive pirate. I steal all my media. I feel no guilt and I also have no delusions about what I am doing. I do it to save money.

          • stappern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            undefined> es it is stealing to take something that does not belong to you

            you are not taking anything . literally nothing.

            im just looking at the thing and making a very good copy with my hard drive. literally taking a picture of something.

            0 objects will be transferred to me in this example. nothing,nada,nulla.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes you are taking something. Of course you are. You are a taking a video file which you do not have the right to. Why do you need to convince yourself there is nothing grimy about doing? Like jesus christ, just be grimey. Wht you gotta lie to yourself?

              • stappern@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                undefined> You are a taking a video file which you do not have the right to

                no im not. my man you can repeat this all day but it doesnt make it true. you dont TAKE anything through the internet. this is FACT. you cant make up physics…

                you can look at something and make an exact copy of it. no objects get transferred. its not a thing.

      • stappern@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        sharing is never stealing since you are not removing anything from somebody :) yall can keep spinning it but a a bag full of all the stuff i shared would be a bag weighing 0 grams.

        • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet you still shared something. Those files exist. This is an extremely weak argument honestly.

          • stappern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            no i havent, i mean you can technically call it sharing but i just let somebody take a look at my 0 and 1 and they arrange them in the same way. again nothing is being transferred other than knowledge of where those 0 and 1 go.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Something is being tranferred, and that is the picture which you do not own nor have any right to own.

              • stappern@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                no its not. if i tell you “hey the 0 gos to the right” i havent transferred shit to you. information is not goods.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I’ve bought the right to play the game, what’s “the game” that I’m entitled to if they decide to take away what makes it the thing I agreed to have access to?