I’ve been using a 6 since it’s release, it’s been solid for me. The 7 is slightly sleeker/smaller but they’re almost identical in performance.
deleted by creator
Making a note of fd and edir for later. Thanks.
Most people start off with something a bit easier - Fedora, Mint, Ubuntu. There’s no reason to jump straight into Arch.
There’s a book by the same title that’s very good.
I love the idea but if anyone knows how to fudge numbers it’s them.
It will only be a matter of time before you hear that the median life expectancy for Americans is 125.
I would if I had them.
It’s always advisable that you teach people how to use anything safely.
This really seems like a non-question. What is there to debate?
That all sounds very idealistic, dare I say naive.
People do not typically assess their own happiness by looking at those less fortunate than themselves. They may feel a sense of relief that their situation isn’t as severe but that is not happiness.
Human beings fall ill and pass on, every day. Those are guaranteed outcomes. So yes, while we may all have unique challenges that we’re all made to face there are some core facets to the human experience that none of us can escape. People who suggest that happiness is anything but fleeting and impermanent are deluding themselves.
The human experience itself is fragile and unpredictable. How then can human happiness not be?
Maybe that’s what they want…
When is happiness stable or permanent? Under what circumstances does that even happen?
“one of the causes of aversion to happiness may be the belief that happiness is unstable and fragile”
It isn’t?
Human beings.
A lot more than just American xtians. There are countries where people cannot get safe, legal abortions because of the stranglehold that xtians have on the political class. Likewise access to contraceptives and even basic reproductive education within the school system. The Roman Catholic Church has been far more destructive than American xtians.
That’s because they make it mandatory at certain schools in the UK, not because it’s genuinely beloved by the populace. Nobody would ever call Rugby “the people’s game”.
It’s the third most popular sport, after cricket. Which most people that I’ve met in the UK have no interest in.
Because it’s a stupid game. Rugby “took off” in places with a significant settler/invader population, which India lacked (relative to the size of the Indian population). Plus, India has its own sports that are far more interesting and then there’s cricket which is a superior game of skill and tact.
Rugby isn’t even popular in the country that birthed the game.
Only kids? I know some very shallow grown folks with kids of their own.