Oh that’s hilarious

If they cancel it I don’t need to support it

It’s incrementing the problem counter in different threads

Understood. CG-NAT has been so annoying, I would love for IPv6 to completely replace v4 ASAP

I figure the mobile carrier was blocking incoming connections to my phone. This was a couple of years ago, things might have changed since then.

Thank you

I didn’t mean prevent, just makes it harder by default. You can still open connections from within the NAT

Edit: I do admit to failing at accessing my IPv6 PC from my IPv6 phone

Edit2: apparently NAT is full of security bugs

You’re talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs

I still have to initiate the outgoing UDP. Are you talking about the specific case where any software running on my host can initiate it without me requesting?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of security bugs

The main benefit of a NAT is that by default it prevents all external access to the hosts inside the network. Any port you have open is not accessible unless explicitly forwarded.

This has a lot of security benefits. Regardless, everything you said is sounds true to me.

Why do you say NAT doesn’t make a network more secure?

Thank you

How do you decide what to listen to? I assume you don’t listen to multiple entire discographies

Discovery Entitlements Affected Titles

As of 31 December 2023, due to our content licensing arrangements with content providers, you will no longer be able to watch any of your previously purchased Discovery content and the content will be removed from your video library.

We sincerely thank you for your continued support.

Thank you,

PlayStation Store

“you’re not wrong, you’re just an asshole”

Dave’s Garage, the man who created task manager

What does the turtle stand on?