Awesome, I’m looking for frameworks like this, thanks for sharing.
Awesome, I’m looking for frameworks like this, thanks for sharing.
Anything that involves deception, which unfortunately seems to be most of marketing.
I don’t mind when people just try to get their product out there, just let it be known that it exists and does X thing differently or better. I hate when they mean to deceive. Something that is intended to deceive but isn’t technically a lie is not really better than a lie, to me.
Removed by mod
I’m pretty damn left leaning and I’ve never been called a tankie. I rarely even see anyone being called a tankie, except people who are defending authoritarians. The scope of the word “tankie” seemed generally pretty clear to me.
I thought that the line was that one supports owning the means of production and the other supports authoritarian governments, am I confused?
I want to add that, like you, I’ve become a big fan of restricting the numbers of ways to do something.
IMO, It’s more time wasted choosing, more time wasted reviewing, and makes it easier to overlook errors. I want more opinionated languages and frameworks.
I kept seeing so many different ones recommended and I kept getting weird issues I didn’t understand with most of them. I don’t often need to make a bootable Linux USB, but every time, Rufus did the job quick and easy.
Rust, because I’m lazy and I want a compiler that helps me out. Performance is a pretty neat bonus.
I think your comment embodies Rust more than any I’ve seen before
That’s what I do all the time, and not on purpose. I don’t know what’s wrong with me
I use main
because, although I never heard of anybody actually getting offended by master
, it costs me nothing to use main
instead. Also it looks prettier and seems to be the new convention ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Also $83/mo HOA, oof.
Thanks for looking it up!
If somebody asked you to bring hot dogs and tacos to a party, the host would probably not be just as fine with you bringing only tacos or only hot dogs.
Disclaimer: I don’t know much about securing the container itself. The considerations I discuss here are mostly networking.
What I’ve personally been doing is using k3s with Cloudflare Tunnel (routed using DNS like in this documentation) as an ingress.
With Cloudflare Tunnel, if you create an application in front of it, you can require authentication and add a list of allowed emails.
I could replace k3s with a different Kubernetes distribution, and/or replace Cloudflare Tunnel with a different ingress (e.g., Tailscale Funnel or more common ingresses like nginx).
Co-pilot can write some small very simple functions for me, sometimes saving me the need to look at documentation. It will still often fail at those, in my experience, and will consistently fail at anything more complex.
It will get better, but currently it’s only a small help.
Great to know this was a bug. It felt a tad immersion breaking for every origin character to be so interested all of a sudden.
I love both proprietary software and open source software, and personally I kinda like this warning.
How much of a concern it is for software’s code to be proprietary, is probably personal opinion. For this reason, maybe yellow is a bit too much? I think making these errors grayscale might be a good middle ground.
Pulling changes should be trivial after you’ve done it a few times.
I do it sometimes, especially when the bug is hard to reproduce and I know exactly what’s causing it. Sometimes it’s quicker to write the tests than to test manually.
The advice I’m most scared not to follow as I get older: don’t dismiss everything that the younger generations say or do as being just a trend, and learn more about it.