Yes, they are.
Yes, they are.
I believe this replaces esync and fsync. IIRC it’s slightly faster and has the benefit of being mainlined.
Typically there’s a period of responsible disclosure to give the software maintainer an opportunity to fix it before it’s widely announced. After that period is up or the fix has been released the vulnerability discoverer is able to announce it and take credit for finding it.
I don’t really get the comparison to vagrant. It doesn’t seem like it feels the same role? Can distro box be used to share environments with other developers or used in CI/CD processes?
Neither because it makes it hard to copy paste. If you have to pick one then $ because # is for comments in bash.
When you start talking about offline then you’re going to run into consistency issues and conflicts. How will a system automatically determine which edit to a file is correct if they were both edited offline?
I’m fairly certain Ceph is also going to be online only. You won’t be accessing your CephFS filesystems when you take your laptop offline since they’re part of the object store.
Something like Syncthing (as @Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me suggested) or some other ‘Dropbox-like’ self-hosted solution might be the way to go for what you’re doing. Even then you’ll probably only want to replicate a subset of your home directory - for example I’d skip temp and cache files that a lot of programs create.
If you want to play with Ceph just for the sake of doing so then don’t let me stop you though :)
Way, way, way overkill even if it could work. Try doing a search for ‘roaming profiles linux’ and you should find some solutions that are a better fit.
The wording is spot-on because it’s not the same Atari that made the 2600, but it is in fact a company called Atari.
This was the first thing I thought of too.
Doesn’t it do dx12 translation?