Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
The ultimate question of philosophy…
“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus
Can’t sell your organs either… Well, not easily.
Audible is open about it. Well, if you dig through the fine print. Easy enough to rip copies but I’d say most people only realise they need to when they loose access. Maybe not, but $30 for an audiobook seems like pretty shity value if you’re only renting it untill you cancel your subscription.
E: I might be misinformed/ outdated.
Bravo.
Worked for books and Audible!
Why did 2 break up with zero?
Some 1 got between them!
Fun Pimps were a smaller company and they have been developing 7 Days since my gramps was in nappies!
F in the chat for victims of the Great Oxygenation Event.
Okay… and what about Alexander, Ceasar, Ali, Genghis, Napoleon, and all the rest? The claim that empires are only motivated by profits is absurd.
You ask what is our aim? I can answer in one word: memes. Meme at all costs. Meme in spite of all terror. Meme however long and hard the banhammer may strike. For without memes there is no dank content.
They’ve done studies on this. Single blokes die sooner because they haven’t got a Mrs to nag them. “Nag”.
That’s… not relevant to my point at all.
Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.