ArkScript lang developer, split keyboard fanatic
Who needs tests when you have users?
The testing environment is production!
I use camel case for methods and functions and snake case for variables. And pascal case for constants. Why? I don’t really know, it makes for a nice distinction I guess.
If you are interested in tiny lisp like languages, this gitlab could be of interest to you.
Full disclaimer, I came across it a few years back as I am the maintainer of arkscript (which will get faster and better in the v4, so that data about it there is accurate as a baseline of « it should be at least this good but can be even better now »).
You could consider markdown extensions that helps you write and visualize!
Like this one: https://github.com/MeanderingProgrammer/render-markdown.nvim
People always make it such a huge deal but that has been pretty normal, since Microsoft owns GitHub we have had a t least 2 if not 4 outages per month.
This feels like not a game but a card grabber. And no, saying « this is just a game » isn’t convincing at all.
Forums really have to get back in the world. I’m trying to ditch discord and move everyone to GitHub discussions for a project (have removed all invite links, just using it for me as a « webhook monitor »). Some people are still there when they have questions on how to use the project (because they prefer speaking in French rather than English).
What do you mean, I’d love to see ai design a potato
Last time I checked they were working on forgejo runners / actions!
I think I’m more fed up with people making those quotes “rust will change everything” when, in fact, it will rule out many if not most memory corruption as you said. Reading your comment, I see now it’s the mentality “everything need to be in rust” that bothers me the most, which in fact means “rust can bring memory safety” and not “rust will replace everything”. Alas I’m seeing it used times and times again as the latter instead of the former.
I’m getting fed up about all those articles “rust x something: the future?”, “I rewrote <cli tool> in rust it’s now memory safe”. I get the rust safeties and all, but that doesn’t automatically make everything great, right ? You can still write shit code in any language that can RM -rf all your disk, or let security gaps here and there without intending to.
I mounted a disk of a server in rescue mode, since I needed to extract everything (the provider didn’t have the option to dump everything as a zip). Then installed an FTP server, added a user/pass, it worked.
But I couldn’t access the files of the original disk, even though I could see them. So I just chgrp/chown the original files, since the disk was just “mounted” in the rescue disk /mnt, I thought it was alright (at the time I thought permissions were volatile, stored separately from the files). I could now download the entire disk, yay!
Upon booting the original disk again, a bunch of errors: shell not starting, tools not running, because they were owned by user and not root…
Well we reinstalled all the server from scratch that day.
The reMarkable runs on Linux too! It’s an eink paper tablet
Ask yourself: do you really need a performance boost or are you just chasing the numbers to avoid a non-existant problem?
People prefer having something generating shitty code and not checking it, instead of asking or searching on internet for a substantially better solution
Right on point ; I use it years ago as my daily driver in terms of wm, but never went very far in term of customisation. Now is maybe the time to look at it again, thanks for the link!
I would have thought that i3wm would use a lot less memory, given how basic it is.
It’s a post from 2 years ago, so if nothing changed as of today, well, I think they didn’t succeed in updating the docs
Probably too long. That was a philosophy I had at school and iirc the founders never finished school and started MS in a garage.